- First described
- 2013
- Into cultivation
- 2012
- Type
- single clone named
Origin
Mike acquired this clone ~2012 from Dean Cook (likely identical to Dean's commercial "GA Giant" listing). First-season under-performance (2012); 2013 produced the first phenomenal pitcher (could support a golfball without bending). Probably the second-most-vigorously-giant rugelii in Mike's collection after Clone A and Clone A × B (Liberty Co, FL).
History
- ~2012 — Mike acquires from Dean Cook as a huge rhizome
- 2013-04-26 — first big-trap year, Mike's introduction
- 2014-04-05 — second-year update; traps were just "big," not giant. Mike speculates rhizome was depleted by 2013's gigantism
- 2015-04-17 — Mike confirms Dean Cook origin in response to rhizomatous question about the GA Giant ebay listing
- 2020-03-26 — flower photos posted "for the sake of documentation"
Standout traits
- Genetically-linked giant trap potential (when conditions + prey align)
- Intermittent gigantism — alternates large and just-big years
- Standard rugelii red throat morphology
Cultivation notes
Outdoor Northern California. The Thomas Co Giant requires good environmental conditions and abundant insect feeding to express its full giant phenotype.
Standout traits
- Giant trap size — supports a golfball without crushing/toppling (Mike, post #1, 2013)
- Year-to-year size variation — 2013 produced gigantic traps; 2014 produced just-big traps (Mike, post #4, 2014: 'perhaps it took a lot of energy out of the rhizome to produce the giant traps last year')
- Late-establishment growth pattern — first season after acquisition produced little; second season produced a phenomenally large trap (Mike, post #7, 2015)
- Standard rugelii red throat with attractive symmetric mouth
Cultivation
Acquired from Dean Cook ~2012 as a "huge rhizome." First season was unremarkable; after acclimating and "catching a choke-load of insects, it produced a phenominally large trap the following year" (Mike, post #7, 2015). Mike notes the gigantic trap response is strongly genetically linked but requires a good environment AND abundant prey to express fully.
Mike's flowers-vs-trap-size observation (post #1, 2013): some growers recommend chopping flowers because they "tax" the rhizome. Mike concludes this is only true for new cuttings; established plants are unaffected by carrying flowers.
Photos (7)
Naming
"Giant" describes the trap size — Mike (post #1, 2013) reports the first pitcher could support a golfball without bending or toppling, whereas most flava traps would. Likely identical to Dean Cook's commercial "GA Giant" listing (rhizomatous post #6, 2015 + Mike's confirmation post #7).